Federal pay ahead of private industry

Recession is nutrient for bureaucrats, elixir for government growth

Originally Posted At USA Today
By Dennis Cauchon
March 6, 2010

These salary figures do not include the value of
health, pension and other benefits, which averaged
$40,785 per federal employee in 2008 vs. $9,882 per
private worker, according to the Bureau of Economic
Analysis.

Federal pay has become a hot political issue in recent
months because of concerns over the federal budget
deficit and recession-battered wages in the private
sector.

Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., made federal pay an issue
in his successful campaign to fill Edward Kennedy's
seat and is fighting for a pay freeze.

The federal government spends about $125 billion
annually on compensation for about 2 million civilian
employees.

"The data flip the conventional wisdom on its head,"
says Cato Institute budget analyst Chris Edwards, a
critic of federal pay policy. "Federal workers make
substantially more than private workers, not less, in
addition to having a large advantage in benefits."

But National Treasury Employees Union President
Colleen Kelley says the comparison is faulty because
it "compares apples and oranges." Federal
accountants, for example, perform work that has more
complexity and requires more skill than accounting
work in the private sector, she says.

"When you look at the actual duties, you see that very few federal jobs align with those in the private
sector," she says. She says federal employees are paid
an average of 26% less than non-federal workers
doing comparable work.

Office of Personnel Management spokeswoman
Sedelta Verble, says higher pay also reflects the
longevity and older age of federal workers.

USA TODAY used Bureau of Labor Statistics data to
compare salaries in every federal job that had a
private-sector equivalent. For example, the federal
government's 57,000 registered nurses — working
for the Veterans Administration and elsewhere — were
paid an average of $74,460 a year, $10,680 more
than the average for private-sector nurses.

The BLS reports that 216 occupations covering 1.1
million federal workers exist in both the federal
government and the private sector. An additional 124
federal occupations covering 750,000 employees —
air-traffic controllers, tax collectors and others — did
not have direct equivalents, according to the BLS.

Federal jobs have more limited salary ranges than
private-sector jobs, some of which have million-
dollar payouts.

Key findings:

Federal. The federal pay premium cut across all job
categories — white-collar, blue-collar, management,
professional, technical and low-skill. In all, 180 jobs
paid better average salaries in the federal
government; 36 paid better in the private sector.

Private. The private sector paid more on average in a
select group of high-skill occupations, including
lawyers, veterinarians and airline pilots. The
government's 5,200 computer research scientists
made an average of $95,190, about $10,000 less
than the average in the corporate world.

State and local. State government employees had an
average salary of $47,231 in 2008, about 5% less
than comparable jobs in the private sector. City and
county workers earned an average of $43,589, about
2% more than private workers in similar jobs. State
and local workers have higher total compensation
than private workers when the value of benefits is included.
 
 

Action Center

Patient Opt Out

What's New?
Get the latest happenings

Mad Enough?
Join the Fight

Stop the Raid!
Sign the Petition

No Health Rationing!
Sign the Petition

No More Bailouts!
Sign the Petition

Seniors Sound Off
Submit your Blog Posts

Please Support SSI
With Your Online Donation

Recent News

Democrats Wave Social Security Bloody Shirt

September 2, 2010
FactCheck.org says White House and Democrats are distorting Social Security issue:  "The president claims Republican leaders are as eager to 'privatize' Social Security as they are to repeal his health care law. That's not true."
Read Full Story

Smackdown of Obama by Supreme Court may be inevitable

August 22, 2010
Source: Examiner.com
According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable.
Read Full Story

Social Security Cuts Weighed by Panel

August 20, 2010
Many Washington insiders predict that any 2011 debate on Social Security will focus on the issues of benefit cuts and tax increases. In addition to raising the retirement age, which is now set to reach age 67 in 2027, specific cuts under consideration include lowering benefits and trimming annual cost-of-living increases.
Read Full Story

How to escape 'cyber past'

August 18, 2010
The private lives of young people are now so well documented on the internet that many will have to change their names on reaching adulthood, Google’s CEO has claimed.
Read Full Story

Obama’s (Latest) Social Security Whopper

August 16, 2010
Source: FactCheck.org
President Obama claimed that Republican leaders are pushing to make "privatizing Social Security a key part of their legislative agenda" should they regain control of the House and Senate. He said this is "right up there on their to-do list with repealing" parts of the new health care law.  FactCheck.org finds the president’s claim to be mostly false.
Read Full Story

Threat to Boomers' Retirement

August 16, 2010
Older workers, who typically fared better than their younger counterparts in recessions, have been hit just as hard by layoffs this time around. As a result, the fraction of people 65 or older who are working has leveled off after a long period of growth. As of July, it stood at 15.9%, down from 16.3% in mid-2008.
Read Full Story

Read All Recent News



Please Sign up for 'Recent News' Updates

Senior Resource Center

Social Networks