Sen. Byrd calls proposed Democratic changes to filibuster rules 'misguided'

Sen. Byrd calls proposed Democratic changes to filibuster rules 'misguided'

Originally Posted At The Hill
By Michael O'Brien
February 24, 2010

Sen. Robert Byrd warned Democratic colleagues against changing filibuster rules in order to advance their legislative priorities.

Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) warned Democratic colleagues Wednesday against changing filibuster rules in order to advance their legislative priorities.

In a "Dear Colleague" letter dated Tuesday, Byrd, the longest-serving member of the Senate, said that the Senate's rules on ending debate shouldn't be changed, but he encouraged forcing senators to actually sustain debate in a real, live filibuster.

"I am sympathetic to frustrations about the Senate's rules, but those frustrations are nothing new," Byrd wrote. "However, I believe that efforts to change or reinterpret the rules in order to facilitate expeditious action by a simple majority, while popular, are grossly misguided."

Some liberal Democrats have called for a change in the Senate's filibuster rules, which require 60 votes to end debate on an issue. In recent years, the mere threat of a filibuster on a matter before the Senate has meant a de facto requirement that most votes in the Senate have to have 60 votes.

The frustration over the filibuster has been especially manifest in the healthcare debate, where all 41 Republicans, sticking together, have been able to sustain a filibuster.

Byrd said the solution to the Senate's impasse would be to force Republican senators to actually filibuster — that is, continually talk and debate on the Senate floor without yielding.

"Senators are obliged to exercise their best judgment when invoking their right to extended debate," Byrd said. " They should also be obliged to actually filibuster — that is, go to the floor and talk, instead of finding less strenuous ways to accomplish the same end."

Action Center

	What's New? Get the latest happenings
	Mad Enough? Join the Fight
	Stop the Raid! Sign the Petition
	No Health Rationing! Sign the Petition
	No More Bailouts! Sign the Petition
	Seniors Sound Off Submit your Blog Posts
	Please Support SSI With Your Online Donation

Recent News

Democrats Wave Social Security Bloody Shirt

September 2, 2010

Source: The Washington Post

FactCheck.org says White House and Democrats are distorting Social Security issue: "The president claims Republican leaders are as eager to 'privatize' Social Security as they are to repeal his health care law. That's not true."
Read Full Story

Smackdown of Obama by Supreme Court may be inevitable

August 22, 2010

Source: Examiner.com

According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable.
Read Full Story

Social Security Cuts Weighed by Panel

August 20, 2010

Source: The Wall Street Journal

Many Washington insiders predict that any 2011 debate on Social Security will focus on the issues of benefit cuts and tax increases. In addition to raising the retirement age, which is now set to reach age 67 in 2027, specific cuts under consideration include lowering benefits and trimming annual cost-of-living increases.
Read Full Story

How to escape 'cyber past'

August 18, 2010

Source: Telegraph.co.uk

The private lives of young people are now so well documented on the internet that many will have to change their names on reaching adulthood, Google’s CEO has claimed.
Read Full Story

Obama’s (Latest) Social Security Whopper

August 16, 2010

Source: FactCheck.org

President Obama claimed that Republican leaders are pushing to make "privatizing Social Security a key part of their legislative agenda" should they regain control of the House and Senate. He said this is "right up there on their to-do list with repealing" parts of the new health care law. FactCheck.org finds the president’s claim to be mostly false.
Read Full Story

Threat to Boomers' Retirement

August 16, 2010

Source: The Wall Street Journal

Older workers, who typically fared better than their younger counterparts in recessions, have been hit just as hard by layoffs this time around. As a result, the fraction of people 65 or older who are working has leveled off after a long period of growth. As of July, it stood at 15.9%, down from 16.3% in mid-2008.
Read Full Story

Read All Recent News

Please Sign up for 'Recent News' Updates